Ahem...
I FINISHED MY LITERATURE REVIEW! I FINISHED MY LITERATURE REVIEW! I FINISHED MY LITERATURE REVIEW!
*dances a jig, trips over the dog, hurts self, gets up, sits back at desk and hopes no one noticed*
Well, I still have to go through and proofread it and finish off a reference here and there, but essentially it is complete, at a total of 6,205 words and 36 references.
On a semi-related note, I feel that I must branch off into a brief rant.
I had always thought that academic papers - either journal articles or conference reports - were submitted to at least some form of standard control before being published. Obviously some errors will get through no matter how many times it's checked, but you would think that by the time it saw the light of day, it would at least be presentable. Now, I've been reading at least a few academic papers for years - being a uni student I didn't have much choice in the matter - but as most assignments only required you to read 5-10 of these articles, quality was something that generally didn't stand out; we just read the bare minumum, referenced quotes we needed and never looked at those articles again. However, now that I'm working on a thesis - which has required me to read upwards of 50 papers - I'm starting to see that problems in the writing are much more common than I thought. And I don't just mean incorrect referencing or misquoted facts. I mean problems with basic spelling and grammar.
I understand that some of these articles are written by people whose first language is not English, but since they were eventually published in an English journal or conference, shouldn't they still have undergone editing and checks for quality and coherence? While some of the errors were minor, some of them were quite substantial, either completely changing the meaning of the sentence or just rendering it impossible to understand. And it's not like it was just one or two sentences; there were at least three or four entire articles that I had to give up on reading because they were impossible to decode. They just did not make sense. I just have to wonder, how do these publications - or academic authors - have any credibility when they can barely string a few words together? Then again, I suppose it will improve my chances of getting my conference paper published later this year...
Okay, so that wasn't exactly brief, but it's a subject that frustrates me. Poor grammar irritates me enough coming from the general public, but from academics who are supposed to have a proper grasp of this sort of thing, it's unacceptable.
Anyhoo.
I'm not going over my literature review tonight, because I'm sick of looking at it, and even one more glance of a paragraph about eBooks will be enough to send me off on a homicidal rampage. Instead I shall try to bully my poor mushy brain into belting out at least a few hundred words of my novella, since apart from a short scene I wrote on Wednesday, I haven't really touched it for a few weeks. Tomorrow I'll look over my literature review before sending it off to my supervisor. I also
really need to start on my two final assignments; a narrative game prototype and a conference paper. Though they're not due til early June, they're going to be
massive assignments, and I also have to find the time to put together two presentations and keep tinkering with my eBook prototype.
I'm gonna need a lot of energy drinks.
I'm also hoping that this time Blogger doesn't throw a tanty and delete all my comments :\
He's a harsh taskmaster, is
Judgemental Dog...

See other ROW80 updates
here.